Friday, June 10, 2011

blake lively face of chanel

images Blake Lively honored at Chanel blake lively face of chanel. Blake Lively - Chanel#39;s Newest
  • Blake Lively - Chanel#39;s Newest



  • somegchuh
    06-10 06:45 PM
    I was wondering if anyone here who had a canadian PR (i.e. did a landing), got GC later has travelled again to Canada again?
    We got canadian PR in 2005 and did a landing while we were waiting for our GC. We got a our GC last year and are planning to visit canada using our GC. Are there going to be any issue in entering canada?

    Also, we travelled to India last year and received new I-94 when we got back into US using AP. Very soon (days) we received our GC's. I am not sure what do with these I-94's when we leave US. Do we still need to surrender these as in the past?





    wallpaper Blake Lively - Chanel#39;s Newest blake lively face of chanel. Chanel: Blake Lively#39;s Debut
  • Chanel: Blake Lively#39;s Debut



  • lostinbeta
    10-20 02:44 AM
    http://www.procreate.com/

    You can find Painter 7 there. They have a trial... I might just download that :)

    Anywho... I think painter is good for textures and things or something. David told me the difference before but I can't remember what exactly he said now.





    blake lively face of chanel. Blake Lively named as new face
  • Blake Lively named as new face



  • apb
    07-27 01:04 PM
    If NSC had put all applications from July 2nd to July 17th on hold.
    Did they open and timestamp it ? for received date ??????

    If they did not , then I may be lucky.
    Because my package had signatures and all other dates of June 29th . The day when we were planning to ship the package, but for july fiasco.

    Do you guys think ? they might see this and enter it as received date ?

    http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/FAQ2.pdf





    2011 Chanel: Blake Lively#39;s Debut blake lively face of chanel. face for Chanel. Blake#39;s
  • face for Chanel. Blake#39;s



  • BharatPremi
    12-10 12:46 PM
    any suggestions if 140 is not approved?

    Filed in August 2007......doesn't look like there is much movement based on tracker!!!!

    EAD in hand

    Yes. If I-140 is not approved, Do not use AC-21.



    more...


    blake lively face of chanel. New Face of Chanel Blake
  • New Face of Chanel Blake



  • nkavjs
    11-15 09:47 AM
    Tri State Folks,
    You just saw priority dates in Dec visa bulletin. What do you plan to do now?
    I have some answers for you but would like to hear from you first..

    Hello IV members : I am mad about discrimination agst Indian and China born applicants for GC processing times. I have read many posts in here and it states to join tri-state chapters .. What does it mean? How can we be part of this.. Pls. elaborate.
    Thanks





    blake lively face of chanel. Blake Lively Lands Chanel
  • Blake Lively Lands Chanel



  • longq
    03-27 02:02 PM
    sorry to hear. your education (degree and specilization) must meet the education requirement for the job as mentioned in the labor certification. In general, MS and MBA is not related, unless your lc states that any master degree acceptable for your job. it is a mistake of your lawyer.



    more...


    blake lively face of chanel. Karl Lagerfeld with Blake
  • Karl Lagerfeld with Blake



  • nave_kum
    08-15 03:22 AM
    why did you want to refile? Did you get a copy of the complete filing from your attorneys office to see what they filed? Was something missed in your first filing?

    Multiple filing is not a good idea - My 2 cents :)





    2010 Blake Lively named as new face blake lively face of chanel. Blake Lively honored at Chanel
  • Blake Lively honored at Chanel



  • mchundi
    07-28 10:17 AM
    Thanks for the reply Mchundi, however, if i CHANGE the job does the rule for a 3 year H1B STILL apply? I mean how does the 3 year thing apply to me? I only have a little over 1 year on this current H1 (out of SIX years).

    h1b-tristate,
    All this was discussed a few times in this thread and other threads as well.
    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=1216
    --MC



    more...


    blake lively face of chanel. Blake Lively is set to become
  • Blake Lively is set to become



  • gchopefull
    10-02 02:22 PM
    I recieved a weired email update from USCIS about the I-140 after RFE documents recived, waited for two days then call the customer service # and the status on the phone said that USCIS denied the case.
    here is the case history.
    LC-Feb-2005.
    I-140 filled march 2007
    I-485/EAD filled July-2007
    EAD approved/EAD card arrived 15 Sep 2007
    I-140 RFE August 2007(A2P)
    I-140 denied 27th Sep 2007.
    my question is,
    what are the options do I have?
    my employer is talking about appeal.
    since the original I-140 is denied will the 485/EAD will get cancelled too?
    is there any way to port the LC date?
    what are the chances of appeal/approval?
    employer is in good standing(financially).
    any suggestions,input will be highly appreciated.
    thanks





    hair face for Chanel. Blake#39;s blake lively face of chanel. Blake Lively Chanel#39;s Newest
  • Blake Lively Chanel#39;s Newest



  • lj_rr
    07-23 10:48 PM
    Indian Citizen GC holder is working in US since 2006 and has GC since 2006.
    Spouse works in India and they had arranged marriage in India in July 2007.
    So the Indian Citizen spouse has never been to US.
    Let me know if you need more info.

    If someone got green card here and got married to Indian citizen, I am not sure how to ask this particular question. She must have seen that guy some how, if so when and where? If that guy had come to US, then he could come again in whichever visa he came in. Also where did they get married? There are options, but certain questions needs to be answered.



    more...


    blake lively face of chanel. Chanel Ad Starring Blake
  • Chanel Ad Starring Blake



  • harivenkat
    05-11 03:21 PM
    Sent a mail to Senator Leahy at : senator_leahy@leahy.senate.gov
    Please send him emails.



    Dear Senator Leahy,

    This is regarding recent hearing from USCIS Director Mayorkas and his response
    to issue of backlog.

    The issue of immigration backlog is a ubiquitous one ranging from family to employment.
    Employment being really the big issue with 1-2 million legally working applicants waiting
    to get greencard.

    It is surprising that Mayorkas is not aware of this Burning situation faced
    by a million plus legal applicants and that he needs to consult the experts. I wonder
    if senate is interested in doing anything better, other than settling in for such a
    mediocre explanation from the Head of USCIS.

    What Mr Mayorkas could have suggested to mitigate the backlog is : Visa Capture, I-485
    Preregistration, senate passing bills to increase visa number and other strategies that will resolve the
    backlog issue. May be he can refer to these forums which can give him some thoughts coming from people
    who are suffering first hand as result of such services of provided by USCIS :

    Analysis Discussion - Immigration Voice (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum108-anal)...

    http://www..com/usa-discussion-forums/i...

    USCIS has already shown us their (fiasco)effeciency during filings of 485 for 800000 applicants in
    Jul 2007. They already are showing when it is coming to visa allocations every month. One wonders what
    gives the confidence to Mr. Mayorkas to admit that USCIS can handle CIR ?

    Mr. Senator, senate deserves a better explanation on strategy to reduce backlog while it owes a
    greater responsibility of bringing relief to million plus tax paying, law abiding legal living applicants. I request you to set a follow up hearing to get to the root of the issue in resolving the backlog problem for EB category skilled worker applicants especially from India and China.


    God bless you Senator !

    Your's sincerely,





    hot New Face of Chanel Blake blake lively face of chanel. Is Blake Lively the new #39;face#39;
  • Is Blake Lively the new #39;face#39;



  • msyedy
    02-12 01:57 PM
    People,

    Yes I am guilty. I am one of those Lazy fence sitters caught in reto that peruses this forum on a daily basis looking for for some glimmer of hope.
    Silently i cross my fingers and hope that IV will get something done for us but guilty of doing nothing to help. Sound familiar?

    Let me start by saying that i became a member and watched this forum for over 6 months and did nothing to contribute (whether financially or physically). I'm lazy and theres nothing i can do about it - thats my personality. We all have busy lives and we all have personal agendas and unless we are affected by something directly, we choose the path of least resistance.

    something changed for me last month. I dont know what it was, since it was nothing physical, personal, familial or anything tangible. I was reading the IV website posts "as normal" and while i read all the posts on funding drives, increasing members, those brillant NJ chapter folks etc I was ashamed at how little i was doing towards a cause that had a direct impact on my life and how a small group of people could be so passsionate about the same interest. I was also surprised at the number of mainly Indian professionals in the US who were caught in this mess but at the difficulty that IV was having getting people to get off their a** and do something.

    COME ON PEOPLE - even if we are lazy, self centered, and busy lets at least show that the Indian "minority" in the US is at least a UNITED and PROUD lot. We cant let IV down for a few dollars. "Izzat ki Sawal Hai"

    Well, i thought about it, and thought some more..... and decided i was still as lazy as i was before even after my ephiphany, but i could definitely manage a few clicks with my mouse. So i decided, If can't do anything physical (like pass flyers, meet in DC to help Core, start some fangled chapter locally, or harass my local congresman) then at least i could pass on some financial contribution so that somebody could do it for me!
    So this is what i did

    a) - setup a $20 recurring contribution (Yes its $20 - I'm cheap and so are a lot of you - but $20 is better than nothing - its less than a dinner at a restaurant).
    b) forwarded the website info to a few of my collegues at work and told them what i did.

    I have not made any earth shattering differences by my actions, but at least im doing SOMETHING. This, coming from one of the laziest members definitely should mean something to all of you.

    If you cant contribute your time, at least send some money so someone else can do it for you! Also please stop harrassing IV on where the funds are going - its $20 per month for Christ's sake, not your family inheritance. Let's try and make a difference one way or another. Our national pride is at stake here.

    Hari

    (IZZAT KI SAWAL) ... It is IZZAT KA SAWAL.
    I am lazy and may be more lazy then anyone. Good to hear from a new enthusiastic person.

    Your enthu will go away soon.



    more...


    house IS BLAKE LIVELY THE NEW FACE blake lively face of chanel. Blake Lively is the new face
  • Blake Lively is the new face



  • go_guy123
    11-03 08:55 PM
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INo69f7f8bo

    About CIR.

    He talks of more H1B.....no green cards :(





    tattoo Blake Lively Lands Chanel blake lively face of chanel. Blake Lively Is Face of Chanel
  • Blake Lively Is Face of Chanel



  • santb1975
    12-24 01:17 PM
    Some of our chapter members have been asking for action items to work on during the holidays. This is a great one



    more...


    pictures Karl Lagerfeld with Blake blake lively face of chanel. Blake Lively the new face for
  • Blake Lively the new face for



  • vladdrac
    06-06 05:30 PM
    VD I love that one...

    I usually end up going towards the left myself





    dresses Is Blake Lively the new #39;face#39; blake lively face of chanel. Blake Lively - New Face for
  • Blake Lively - New Face for



  • IV2007
    06-25 12:06 PM
    Guys,

    My wife is on first time H1. She got her H4 converted to H1 in Jan '07. I am applying for 485 and she's secondary applicant on my file.

    What are the pros & cons of travelling to India in 3rd week of Aug 07, assuming we will get the reciept by then (EB2) ?

    We have planned for H1 stamping back in India while she's on vacation.

    here's my thoughts on this; If her h1 gets stamped she doesn't need AP. however if H1 gets rejected for some reason, in that case she can stay back in India until I recieve the AP documents. I send it to her then she can travel back on AP. ??

    Any Suggestions or gyan on this !!!

    -shree



    more...


    makeup Blake Lively is set to become blake lively face of chanel. IS BLAKE LIVELY THE NEW FACE
  • IS BLAKE LIVELY THE NEW FACE



  • vcurichmond
    08-21 12:35 PM
    JULY 19th Filer Checks got encashed.

    My I-485 checks got encashed on August 20, 2007. I filed at NSC.

    VCURich





    girlfriend Blake Lively Is Face of Chanel blake lively face of chanel. IT#39;S OFFICIAL: BLAKE LIVELY IS
  • IT#39;S OFFICIAL: BLAKE LIVELY IS



  • Michael chertoff
    02-19 10:05 AM
    Hello, I'm wondering what steps I need to take in order to help my husband become a US resident (eventually a citizen but one step at a time). I have figured out that we need to fill out an I-130 but I keep seeing everyone talk about an I-485 and I'm curious if we need to use that one as well, and how many others???

    Really quickly, our history: I'm a 19 year old US citizen by birth, and my husband is a 27 year old undocumented alien from Mexico. We just got married on Valentines day 2011 and I'm pregnant also which is why I would prefer to do this quickly as to prevent a possible deportation although he is an amazingly wonderful guy who's never had a run in with the law, it's just a constant concern of mine. =( He also has a 5 year old son from a previous marriage with an American woman (she cheated on him, and then divorced him) who we eventually would like to get custody for since his mother is a very bad person but that's another story.

    I realize this is a complicated process that most people would suggest using a lawyer for, but I know there's people out there that have accomplished this without one and so that is my goal to do this on our own but I'm thinking that some advice from experienced individuals would benefit me greatly in this task. =) Any help you're willing to give would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks so much <3

    Fifteen minutes, could save you 15 percent or more on your car insurance.





    hairstyles Chanel Ad Starring Blake blake lively face of chanel. Do you think Blake was the
  • Do you think Blake was the



  • hello
    04-14 12:36 PM
    Hope we can get more people here.





    EB-VoiceImmigration
    02-24 08:50 PM
    Moving to the Faster Lane : Changing EB3 to EB2

    We at the Murthy Law Firm receive many inquiries as to whether it is possible for an individual with an employment-based, third preference (EB3) case to change to the employment-based, second preference (EB2) category. As explained in this article, it is possible for many some people to make this transition. When combined with the potential to retain the priority date from the earlier employment-based (EB) case, this can be a powerful tool for qualified individuals to obtain permanent residence, or the "green card," much earlier.

    EB3 Cannot Simply be Changed to EB2

    Often individuals ask whether their current EB3 cases can somehow be converted to EB2s. They will usually mention that they had enough education and/or experience to meet the EB2 requirements at the time the EB3 case was filed. The answer to this is simply, "No." The EB category of any labor certification-based case is set at the beginning, when the labor certification is prepared and filed. The category depends on the requirements specified in the labor certification. If these requirements are at the EB3 level, then the case is filed as an EB3, even if the foreign national beneficiary may have qualifications in terms of the education and work experience sufficient for an EB2 level job.

    New EB2 Case Filing Based on Minimum Job Requirements

    It is possible for an individual with an EB3 case to have either the existing employer / sponsor or a new employer file a new case in the EB2 category. Of course, the new position must meet the EB2 requirements, and the individual must qualify for the offered position. The starting point must always be with the job requirements, not one's own education and experience. It is the job that must fit within the EB2 category, as the law requires that the employer specify the minimum education and other qualifications for the specific job. Then, of course, the beneficiary must be able to establish that s/he meets the education and experience required for the job.

    New EB2 Filing Permissible with Job Change

    It is not unusual for an individual with an EB3 case to qualify for EB2. This happens when one acquires additional education and/or experience through the years during which the EB3 case has been pending. Over time, people often are promoted into jobs that may meet the EB2 requirements.

    Typically, questions about potentially changing to EB2 come from individuals who have reached the point where they have filed their I-485s. They have waited for a number of years, but are suffering under the enormous waiting times in the EB3 category. Many have used AC21 to change jobs, are advancing in their careers, and now hold jobs that could meet the EB2 standards.

    EB2 Filing can be with Existing or New Employer

    As explained above, in order to move from EB3 to EB2 it is necessary to start over with an entirely new labor certification. This often is filed through a new employer, when an individual has moved to a different job.

    It potentially could be filed through the same employer that filed the EB3 labor certification. This could be appropriate if one obtained a promotion or otherwise moved into an EB2 job. If filing through the same employer, the employee ideally should have completed the minimum years of work experience for the EB2 position before starting work with the current employer. This is because there are legal issues and potential restrictions when relying on the experience gained with the same employer to qualify for the new job. These issues should be analyzed and discussed with an attorney experienced and knowledgeable immigration law.

    Transfer of Earlier Priority Date to New Case Filing

    The greatest benefit to utilizing the strategy of re-filing comes in the potential to retain the priority date from the EB3 case. This option exists if the EB3 I-140 petition has been approved. If so, then it is possible to request retention of this priority date in the later-filed EB2 case. This means that it potentially is possible to transfer the earlier EB3 priority date to the later-filed EB2 case with a new or the same employer. In many cases, this means that the individual could have a current or closer-to-current priority date, thus saving many years of waiting to become eligible for permanent residence.

    There are some issues with respect to retention of the priority date if the I-140 has been revoked. Generally, however, it is the policy of the USCIS to allow the retention and transfer of the earlier priority date if the I-140 petition has not been revoked by the USCIS for fraud or misrepresentation.

    Is Earlier EB3 Filing Made Vulnerable by Filing New EB2?

    Most people inquiring about this option are concerned about any potential risks to their current EB3 cases. There are some procedural options with respect to the final step in the re-filed cases. However, it is possible to process the new case without risk of disruption to the EB3 case. This assumes that all information provided in the course of the prior filing was accurate.

    A new labor certification filing, even if not approved, would not disrupt a prior approval. The same holds true for an I-140 filing. Conversely, approvals of the labor certification and I-140 do not disrupt or displace existing approvals. It is possible to have multiple approvals of labor certifications and I-140s for the same individual. Even when the request to retain the earlier priority date from the EB3 case is granted, the prior EB3 case remains undisturbed. There is nothing transferred or taken away from the EB3 case in the process of requesting that the EB2 case be assigned the same priority date.

    At the final stage, there are options as to how to complete the case. The pros and cons should be discussed with a qualified immigration attorney. It is possible to proceed with the cases essentially in parallel, allowing for two cases and two potential avenues for eventual approval of permanent residence. The best way to proceed depends upon one's situation and, ideally, should be analyzed to consider the risks and options. What is helpful to most people, however, is that they do not have to risk their current EB3 cases to try to move to EB2.

    Conclusion

    At the Murthy Law Firm, we have successfully utilized the strategy discussed in this article for many of our clients by filing for each a new EB2 case with the same or a new employer. While it requires starting over with a new labor certification, for many it offers a significant advantage in terms of timing when the earlier priority date can be retained. MurthyDotCom and MurthyBulletin readers who wish to explore this option further should contact the Murthy Law Firm to help them with this process or for a consultation to determine whether it is appropriate for them.

    Copyright � 2010, MURTHY LAW FIRM. All Rights Reserved





    singhsa3
    08-29 01:22 PM
    I think they had understanding of RD all along. The reason I say that is anytime I contacted IO or went to InfoPass they had this information.
    What was different then was that they had all applications in sets of boxes, which had random applications.
    Now thinking logically, it would take them lots of efforts to sort that mess out. And the best way out is to retrogress to a point where the available number of visas will be utilized as well a degree of fairness can be achieved.
    Published dates are only a general ballpark information to indicate where are for the remaining cases. Havn't they already granted visas to those filed in August/Sept '07?

    This change is all due to their better understanding of what is a Receive Date. So far, they have been treating date when they physically enter data in the system (date which you see online as "we received your case on...") as the Receive Date, and making all predictions, postings and claims based on that. Now they know that it is what you see on your receipt as the Receive Date, and hence the back step in the dates. TSC is at June 18, NSC is at July 2.

    They should better post where they are based on PDs, and work based on that too.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment