LNYMRKO
Apr 18, 07:26 AM
no worries fella, thanks for the link. I've actually found it with red pants so have stuck that on.
Will have a nose for the cart one though.
Ohh, my turn... do you have the link for the red pants one? haha
Will have a nose for the cart one though.
Ohh, my turn... do you have the link for the red pants one? haha
MarkCollette
Oct 31, 02:56 PM
Not meaning to be a pain, but is the capacity 1,000,000,000 bytes/10^9 bytes/1 GB, or is it 1,073,741,824 bytes/2^30 bytes/1 GiB? Ignoring file formatting issues, of course.
Doctor Q
Oct 28, 10:50 PM
No need for an apology. Post as many as you like!
fs454
Apr 21, 06:40 PM
no.
more...
Some_Big_Spoon
Sep 26, 08:44 PM
Neat looking. It's about time that Apple came on par with Outlook / Exchange webmail.
Neolithium
Apr 8, 05:55 PM
Nothing special this month.
more...
PaRaGoNViCtiM
Sep 16, 12:09 PM
You could buy the "iPak". It comes with 2 cases, one for your iPod, and one for your accessories. TIP: They sell them at TJMaxx and Marshalls for cheap!!!!! Buy them there!!!!!
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a163/Paragonvictim/94d763b0-3f60-467f-8c1c-129751ebd49.gif
hair colour? Pink amp; lack
more...
Dying Pink and Blue Hair.
blonde and lack hair ideas
more...
Pink over my lack hair.
Related: Black Hair With Red
more...
I bought the Live Color XXL
Tagged: blonde, hair color,
more...
pink and lack color,
Manic Panic Hair Colour
more...
Blaze Hair Color,
changing her hair colour;
Black White Pink Braids Shaved
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a163/Paragonvictim/94d763b0-3f60-467f-8c1c-129751ebd49.gif
johnnyfiive
Aug 14, 04:39 PM
The bootcamp desktop. :D
more...
Frankydan100
Apr 4, 05:00 PM
Ok so ive just discovered the joys of Geektools today so ive been playing around with that. Got 3 variations running the same scripts but with different wallpapers.....
All very Apple based as you can probably tell! Think I prefer the first one!!
All very Apple based as you can probably tell! Think I prefer the first one!!
speedylomeli
Apr 9, 02:00 PM
Why don't they just admit it. It's a security patch. Every small patch released in between full digit numbers tend to be security patches. The next real update will be 5.0.
more...
W1MRK
Apr 16, 05:20 PM
Heres mine for April
Might I ask where you found this picture please ?
Might I ask where you found this picture please ?
tktaylor1
Feb 5, 02:20 PM
Nyc
more...
blevins321
Apr 28, 09:16 AM
Do you have the Gmail accounts setup as Pop or Imap? If it's Pop, try switching them to IMap.
Hildron101010
Mar 23, 09:53 AM
Haha, the caption for the picture is wrong. It says he is demoing Lion, but he's really showing Snow Leopard.
more...
nburwell
Oct 9, 03:06 PM
I typed in both 'Tweetie' and 'Tweetie 2' but it comes up with "no matches." I'll keep trying.
AndroidfoLife
Apr 21, 11:38 AM
Except iOS is not a exclusively a smartphone OS. Again, if you are a developer, the metric that matters is how many devices are using the particular platform.
You can't have it both ways. You can't compare one phone (the iPhone) against every phone out that runs Android. You either have to do a one-to-one comparison of manufacturer to manufacture (that gives you revenue/number of handsets sold/profitability /market share, etc... Android has no revenue, only the manufacturers). Or you have to compare platforms, which includes all iOS devices and all Android devices capable of running apps such as PMPs, tablets and phones. Here, you can look at how much Google makes from ads generated by users of Android phones which, i think is a more valuable and telling metric. And one that would benefit the Android argument.
But the main point is: DEVELOPERS JUST DON"T CARE ABOUT iPHONE VS. ANDROID, or iPhone vs. HTC, or iPhone vs. anything. All they care about is how many people will have access to their app. THEY ARE THE ONES THAT COUNT! Not you, fandroids, or Apple lovers.
Really, it's kind of a pointless article. The majority of people arguing over this do not develop apps. I'm sure there are some devs who do, but their time would be far better spent making sure their apps are available for both devices.
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOR you can compare smartphone OSs like what is normally done.
You can't have it both ways. You can't compare one phone (the iPhone) against every phone out that runs Android. You either have to do a one-to-one comparison of manufacturer to manufacture (that gives you revenue/number of handsets sold/profitability /market share, etc... Android has no revenue, only the manufacturers). Or you have to compare platforms, which includes all iOS devices and all Android devices capable of running apps such as PMPs, tablets and phones. Here, you can look at how much Google makes from ads generated by users of Android phones which, i think is a more valuable and telling metric. And one that would benefit the Android argument.
But the main point is: DEVELOPERS JUST DON"T CARE ABOUT iPHONE VS. ANDROID, or iPhone vs. HTC, or iPhone vs. anything. All they care about is how many people will have access to their app. THEY ARE THE ONES THAT COUNT! Not you, fandroids, or Apple lovers.
Really, it's kind of a pointless article. The majority of people arguing over this do not develop apps. I'm sure there are some devs who do, but their time would be far better spent making sure their apps are available for both devices.
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOR you can compare smartphone OSs like what is normally done.
more...
blondepianist
May 1, 02:33 PM
There is a castle on a cloud�
dark knight
Apr 7, 06:59 PM
i know this would require different licensing deals but, assuming that most people will have similar collections of commercially available songs on their ipods, surely apple would not have to keep different instance of the same mater in each users imaginary allocated space.
just get apple to serve you music it knows that you own. admittedly this would stop working for totally individual content.
as a side note i have simply no idea if people actually get round to listening to the 10's of GB's of songs they have on their ipods! when your library total playtime is in years, you have too much music.
just get apple to serve you music it knows that you own. admittedly this would stop working for totally individual content.
as a side note i have simply no idea if people actually get round to listening to the 10's of GB's of songs they have on their ipods! when your library total playtime is in years, you have too much music.
jared1988
Apr 20, 03:29 AM
wow, thats a nice time lapse Jared!
not my photo :o im not smart enough to work a camera, and im too broke to get one too
not my photo :o im not smart enough to work a camera, and im too broke to get one too
Warbrain
Apr 4, 11:07 AM
I think Apple's policy allows for users to opt-in to sharing their personal data.
That ability is there. But rather than give its customers a choice of opting in, FT would rather sell your information without your approval.
That ability is there. But rather than give its customers a choice of opting in, FT would rather sell your information without your approval.
DuFFy
Jun 15, 11:35 PM
I WOULDDD..but drexel is on break this week so im not around :rolleyes:
/user/me
Mar 9, 11:15 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QS0q3mGPGg&feature=feedf
Not quite sure how that fits here....
Not quite sure how that fits here....
sikkinixx
Sep 2, 06:41 PM
Soooo tomorrow is the day. Finally, months after watching those damn east coasters get a taste of PAX, it's back home on the best coast. Huzzah!
Gonna get on the inFamous machines asap as well as the Killzone 3 machines before they get mobbed down. Money is on Halo Reach being ***** nuts, as will the 3DS (if it's there......)
I'll post pics as always. Yeehaw
Gonna get on the inFamous machines asap as well as the Killzone 3 machines before they get mobbed down. Money is on Halo Reach being ***** nuts, as will the 3DS (if it's there......)
I'll post pics as always. Yeehaw
gibbz
Oct 12, 12:29 PM
Its not supposed be be less functional than the app that came before it.
I would think themes would fall under the "form" category, rather than "function"
I would think themes would fall under the "form" category, rather than "function"
No comments:
Post a Comment