Saturday, June 18, 2011

taran killam and cobie smulders

images Taran Killam spent a year at taran killam and cobie smulders. been curious Taran+killam
  • been curious Taran+killam



  • gconmymind
    10-31 01:46 PM
    Some of my friends have already received EADs without the FP.

    I am still waiting for receipts - filed 13th August





    wallpaper been curious Taran+killam taran killam and cobie smulders. Yeap, Blauman (Taran Killam)
  • Yeap, Blauman (Taran Killam)



  • vban2007
    05-29 11:11 AM
    October 1st, 2008 your status will be changed to H1B after the approval... So you will have to move to new company





    taran killam and cobie smulders. Taran-Killam
  • Taran-Killam



  • vnsriv
    03-27 11:02 AM
    Hi All,
    My gc was filed in Jun 2002 under EB3. I had approved labour and I-140.(in feb 2004).
    I had filed my I-485 in June 2005 and got EAD in one month. I got married in Jan.
    So is this correct that I can file my wife's case only when priority dates become current?
    Now the real question is how do I keep track of this.

    Option 1

    On US buletin, as of April, http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_2847.html

    All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed CHINA INDIA MEXICO PHILIP-PINES

    Employment-Based
    1st C 01JAN04 01JAN05 C C
    2nd C 01JAN03 01JUL02 C C
    3rd 01MAY01 01MAY01 01FEB01 08APR01 01MAY01

    So I should look at wait till my priorites date become current?(change from 01 Feb to Jun 2002) Is that correct?




    Option 2
    https://egov.immigration.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=Vermont

    I-485 Application to register **** Employement Based adjustments application March 01,2005

    Does it mean if I-485 dates move from March 01 to Jun 2005, I can file my spouse's case

    Please suggest which is the correct way to keep the track

    Thanks a lot





    2011 Yeap, Blauman (Taran Killam) taran killam and cobie smulders. Cobie Smulders
  • Cobie Smulders



  • imneedy
    09-04 11:56 AM
    .....is marriage. If one is planning to get married soon, it is better to get married and jointly file for spouse after he/she is here.

    This is not correct, you only have to worry about spouse at I-485 stage.



    more...


    taran killam and cobie smulders. l#39;acteur Taran Killam,
  • l#39;acteur Taran Killam,



  • ashkam
    12-03 04:46 PM
    You are welcome. Another important thing to look at (from the document) is that for the first 26 weeks of unemployment, benefits are disbursed through a fund paid for by unemployment taxes on companies, thereby not making it a public burden. After 26 weeks, however, extended unemployment benefits are paid by the federal government, which makes it a public burden, which would be detrimental to a person's green card prospects.





    taran killam and cobie smulders. Taran Killam albums, lyrics,
  • Taran Killam albums, lyrics,



  • acecupid
    02-25 12:57 PM
    LoL. No wonder she got caught. She is not only a thief, she is also stupid.
    :rolleyes:

    Whenever people post for their friend mostly likely its their own story. Good observation indeed.



    more...


    taran killam and cobie smulders. Taran Killam Pics
  • Taran Killam Pics



  • neoklaus
    11-12 07:57 PM
    I did not apply medical form with I 485, but got receipts on time.





    2010 Taran-Killam taran killam and cobie smulders. Taran Killam spent a year at
  • Taran Killam spent a year at



  • MYGCBY2010
    07-27 02:37 PM
    >>>>><<<<<<



    more...


    taran killam and cobie smulders. this hilarioustaran killam
  • this hilarioustaran killam



  • eastindia
    05-14 04:15 PM
    It is time to pass the DREAM Act.





    hair Cobie Smulders taran killam and cobie smulders. taran Cobie+smulders+baby
  • taran Cobie+smulders+baby



  • looivy
    03-23 02:39 AM
    Can a legal expert provide advice as to whether I can use EAD/AP to get in?

    Bump again



    more...


    taran killam and cobie smulders. Cobie Smulders
  • Cobie Smulders



  • franklin
    06-27 04:41 PM
    This question has been answered multiple times on this forum. Instead of starting a new thread I suggest

    1. Doing a forum search
    2. Donating money to IV since you will have saved so much of your time getting an immediate answer





    hot l#39;acteur Taran Killam, taran killam and cobie smulders. Taran Killam
  • Taran Killam



  • meridiani.planum
    06-15 02:07 PM
    hi,
    Can someone help me with the situation i'm in.
    I had H1B Visa validityfrom X company from 06/2004 - 12/2007.Applied for extension in June 2007. I had
    query on it and i got status update in Feb 2008,stating request for evidence(RFE) documents.
    X company send the documents but got denial on May 2 , 2008. I had 2 options at this point of time
    first one was make an appeal with right documents. second one was to leave the country in 30
    days which i has NOT choosen obviously.
    In the mean time, i have applied for H1-B Transfer with new company with premium processing. Also made appeal with old company (X) , I'm waiting for the decision of appeal. but now, i got
    APPROVAL on my H1-B Transfer with new company.
    I-94 that i have on my passport is with Old company(X) .

    Question is:
    I need to revalidate my visa that was expired in December 2007. I received my H1B extention last week
    when i met Immigration officer close to where i live. she said u r good to travel with new I#94 number (which is same as old one). but without visa how would it be possible.
    Do i really need stamping to go out of US to visit my native country?

    Pls advise. Any answers would be appreciated

    + you need a new visa stamp to re-enter the country. New approval notice alone is not enough.

    + did you get an I-94 with the new companys H1 approval notice? When you applied that H1, what did you specify as your old employer? company X or the company whose H1 was denied and is now under appeal? Because that makes the intermediate H1 a 'bridge' petition, and opens up potentical complications.... read the following:
    http://www.immigration-information.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5176
    http://www.murthy.com/chatlogs/ch021808_P.html



    more...


    house Para navegao engaged to taran taran killam and cobie smulders. Cobie Smulders and Taran Killam at the Boston Bruins vs Vancouver Canucks
  • Cobie Smulders and Taran Killam at the Boston Bruins vs Vancouver Canucks



  • lakshman.easwaran
    07-25 11:44 AM
    Anybody knows how USCIS will process un signed I-140 Petition? I filed for Labor substituion and I-140. I forgot to sign the I-140 petition.

    May I know the implications of this? What all are the possibilities ? Will they reject the application?

    If I remember correctly, I signed only one form for 140 and that was G-28, I believe. I did not sign actual 140 form...for sure. My 140 petition was accepted on July 10 and received 797 receipt on July 16. BTW, mine was not Labor substitution.





    tattoo Taran Killam albums, lyrics, taran killam and cobie smulders. Taran Killam
  • Taran Killam



  • yagw
    12-10 03:01 PM
    The dot system if used properly is a good system as other community members can privately control the reputation of each other. Community can also identify posters who are mischief makers by giving them reds and identifying them publicly. This reduces the need for moderators significantly as moderators cannot read every post and every thread everyday. Pls suggest better ways in which we should handle reputation system.

    Pappu,
    This reasoning may not apply here. Lets see, what is the positive effect of "other community members controlling reputation of each other"? We are not ignoring some one's post just because he got lot of red dots. Like wise, we don't value some one's post because he got more green dots. Do we? AFAI see here, we value the post based on its content.

    Also, I am not sure how this reputation system helps moderators. From seeing the posts here, the members always alerts the admin to delete some offensive posts and not the reputation points.

    So the better option is, remove this reputation system and let the users call out for admins to delete posts, if it is offensive. That way, the moderators/admins don't have to read all the posts.

    Or at least remove the anonymous nature of the reputation system.

    I personally think, this anonymous nature of affecting some one else' reputation brings the worst out of our human nature. I have got some red dots a while back with comments like "don't answer trivial questions." I know who that person is and I am pretty sure the real intention is different.

    Even though it didn't put me off from visiting IV, things like this definitely makes it not a welcoming place.

    YAGW.



    more...


    pictures Taran Killam Pics taran killam and cobie smulders. TARAN KILLAM - Page 5
  • TARAN KILLAM - Page 5



  • lvaka
    07-18 10:58 AM
    I read some where that filing is allowed to Aug-17, but the new fees will effected on 01-Aug although July filers.

    Correct me If I'm wrong.


    Here is the Actual update link from USCIS.gov
    http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/VisaBulletinUpdate17Jul07.pdf

    You can go to USCIS.gov page and look for the press releases.

    New fees will apply to the ppl whose labor gets approved after July 31st. For all the guys who are eligible according to the June 12th Visa Bulletin, though they apply till Aug 7th, only old fees applies.

    Good luck.





    dresses Taran Killam taran killam and cobie smulders. Mother,cobie smulders
  • Mother,cobie smulders



  • babu123
    06-29 10:10 AM
    What I heard is, 485 packet need to be send to the office where the I-140 got approved.



    more...


    makeup this hilarioustaran killam taran killam and cobie smulders. Para navegao engaged to taran
  • Para navegao engaged to taran



  • mlkedave
    03-06 07:56 PM
    I was the first to show my site, then paddy, then dark and then fern so i really dont see any influence may it be progressive or negative...





    girlfriend Taran Killam taran killam and cobie smulders. TARAN KILLAM - Page 3
  • TARAN KILLAM - Page 3



  • gcpool
    08-30 09:16 AM
    Advance parol was not taken and can we still use parole as a status.

    Unknown is good but I was wondering if it would raise any red flags





    hairstyles Cobie Smulders taran killam and cobie smulders. Taran Killam Pics
  • Taran Killam Pics



  • royus77
    05-22 04:31 PM
    Good question , I also want to know more on this as i am thinking of moving . Is there any hard date where USICS stop accepting I 140 petitions ?





    simple1
    05-11 06:49 PM
    desi3933,

    Only if "if not otherwise entitled to an immigrant status and the immediate issuance of a visa under subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section"

    In this case they are eligible for FB2A. So it nullifies that.

    again “respective subsection” is not referring to primary’s subsection.
    same status = parolee, denied etc.
    same order of consideration = PD order.
    respective subsection=the respective/related/corresponding subsection of derivative not the primary.

    This point was already discussed on member's and donor's thread with same subject.
    Member thread: http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=25432
    Donor thread: http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=340449

    This thread is for lawyer's thoughts. I appreciate you post your thoughts on the above member/donor threads and let us keep this thread for Attorney only.

    Thanks.


    INA 203(d) Treatment of family members

    A spouse or child as defined in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), (D), or (E) of section 1101(b)(1) of this title shall, if not otherwise entitled to an immigrant status and the immediate issuance of a visa under subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section, be entitled to the same status, and the same order of consideration provided in the respective subsection, if accompanying or following to join, the spouse or parent.


    This means that if primary beneficiary is using visa number from EB(2) classification then dependent(s) will also be using same classification as primary beneficiary (i.e. EB(2) in this example).


    ______________________
    Not a legal advice
    US citizen of Indian origin





    subba
    12-13 07:41 PM
    I guess the 10 days is "time for pack up" technically.
    That is what the POE officer always stamped on my I94.

    I was driving to the US from Canada and got a new I-94 on the port of entry. Immigration officer put a date that was 10 days ahead of the expiry on my I-797 telling me that I would have 10 additional days post I-797 expiry to leave the country.

    Is this normal? Do I need the date changed on my I-94 to be the date I have on I-797? I would really appreciate your input on this.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment